微曝氧化沟气液两相传质模型构建及传质影响因素分析

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.218305

过程工程学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 676-684.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.218305

微曝氧化沟气液两相传质模型构建及传质影响因素分析

刘凤霞，李永强，许晓飞，董鑫，刘志军*

大连理工大学

收稿日期:2018-11-01 修回日期:2018-12-12 出版日期:2019-08-22 发布日期:2019-08-15
通讯作者: 李永强 1243737622@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目;教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金项目;辽宁省博士科研启动基金项目

Model construction and influence factor analysis of gas-liquid mass transfer in a fine-bubble oxidation ditch

Fengxia LIU, Yongqiang LI, Xiaofei XU, Xin DONG, Zhijun LIU*

Research & Design Institute of Fluid and Powder Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China

Received:2018-11-01 Revised:2018-12-12 Online:2019-08-22 Published:2019-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于ANSYS Fluent软件建立了微曝氧化沟气–液两相流动和溶解氧输运模型，对比不同工况下氧体积传质系数的实验测量值和模拟结果，误差在7%以内。采用验证可靠性的模型模拟研究了气泡直径、曝气量和横向流动速度对微曝氧化沟内氧传质的影响。结果表明，气泡直径由1.5 mm增至3 mm时，氧体积传质系数由15.80 h?1降低至5.83 h?1；曝气量由0.5 m3/h增大至2 m3/h时，氧体积传质系数由4.21 h?1增至14.15 h?1，减小气泡直径和增大曝气量能明显提高氧体积传质系数。微曝氧化沟内气–液相间传质及溶解氧的分布受横向流动影响，开启单台和两台推流泵时，氧体积传质系数分别比无横向推流工况增大27.7%和42.4%，横向流动能有效提高气泡羽流内的气含率，增强氧传质效果。

关键词: 气液两相流, 传质, 数值模拟, 气含率, 微孔曝气, 横向流动

Abstract: The gas–liquid flow model and dissolved oxygen transport model in a fine-bubble oxidation ditch were established based on ANSYS Fluent software. Reliability of the model was verified under different operating conditions. The deviation between volumetric mass transfer coefficient obtained by simulation and experiment was less than 7%. Then, the effect of bubble diameter, aeration flow rate and transverse flow intensity on oxygen mass transfer were investigated by the verified model. The results indicated that as the bubble diameter increased from 1.5 mm to 3 mm, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient decreased from 15.80 h?1 to 5.83 h?1 and as the aeration flow rate increased from 0.5 m3/h to 2 m3/h, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient increased from 4.21 h?1 to 14.15 h?1. The volumetric mass transfer coefficient could be considerably improved by decreasing the bubble size and increasing the aeration flow rate. The distribution of dissolved oxygen and effect of oxygen mass transfer in the oxidation ditch would be affected by transverse flow intensity. Compared with operational condition with aerating only, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient increased by 27.7% and 42.4% respectively when single and double impellers were introduced in combination with aerating. The transverse flow could enhance the gas holdup in bubble plume and thus improve the effect of oxygen mass transfer.

Key words: gas-liquid flow, mass transfer, numerical simulation, gas holdup, micro-aeration, transverse flow

刘凤霞李永强许晓飞董鑫刘志军. 微曝氧化沟气液两相传质模型构建及传质影响因素分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(4): 676-684.

Fengxia LIU Yongqiang LI Xiaofei XU Xin DONG Zhijun LIU. Model construction and influence factor analysis of gas-liquid mass transfer in a fine-bubble oxidation ditch[J]. Chin. J. Process Eng., 2019, 19(4): 676-684.

参考文献

[1] 许保玖. 当代给水与废水处理原理[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,1991: 358-377.
Xu B J. Principle of contemporary water supply and wastewater treatment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1991: 358-377.
[2] 夏岚, 李遵龙, 郑朋. 荧光原位杂交法研究氧化沟内微生物群落分布特征[J]. 化工进展, 2012, 31(z2): 203-207.
Xia L, Li Z L, Zheng P. Characteristics of distribution of microbial community in oxidation ditch using fluorescence in situ hybridization[J].Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2012, 31(z2): 203-207.
[3] 金昌权, 汪诚文, 曾思育等. 污水处理厂能耗特征分析方法与节能途径研究[J]. 给水排水, 2009, 35(z1): 272-232.
Jin C Q, Wang C W, Zeng S Y, et al. Study on Energy consumption characteristic analysis method and energy-saving approach in sewage treatment plant[J]. Water & Water Wastewater Engineering, 2009, 35(z1): 272-23.
[4] Vermande S, Chaumaz M, Marsal S, et al. Modélisation numérique d’un bassin à grande profondeur[J]. Récent progrès en Génie des Procédés, 2005, 92: 8.
[5] Stamou A I. Improving the hydraulic efficiency of water process tanks using CFD models[J]. Chem. Eng. Process, 2008, 47(8): 1179-1189.
[6] Yang Y, Yang J, Zuo J, et al. Study on two operating conditions of a full-scall oxidation ditch for optimization of energy consumption and effluent quality by using CFD[J]. Water Res., 2011, 45(11): 3439-3452.
[7] Sekizawa T, Fujie K, Kubota H, et al. Air diffuser performance in activated sludge aeration tanks[J]. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 1985, 57(1): 53-59.
[8] Yang Y, Wu Y, Yang X, et al. Flow field prediction in full-scale carrousel oxidation ditch by using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Water science and technology, 2010, 62(2): 256-265.
[9] 吴莹莹. 氧化沟流场和溶解氧CFD模拟研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2009.
Wu Y Y. CFD Simulation of flow field and dissolved oxygen in oxidation ditch[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University Of Science And Technology，2009.
[10] Fayolle Y, Cockx A, Gillot S, et al. Oxygen transfer prediction in aeration tanks using CFD[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2007, 62(24): 7163-7171.
[11] Cockx A, Audic J M, Line A, et al. Global and local mass transfer coefficients in waste water treatment process by computational fluid dynamics[J]. Chem. Eng. Process., 2001, 40(2): 187-194.
[12] Mitsuharu T, Magnus S, Rajeev G, et al. Determination of diffuser bubble size in computational fluid dynamics models to predict oxygen transfer in spiral roll aeration tanks[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2016, 12: 120-126.
[13] Sanchez F, Rey H, Viedma A, et al. CFD simulation of fluid dynamic and biokinetic processes within activated sludge reactors under intermittent aeration regime[J]. Water Research, 2018, 139: 47-57.
[14] 谢浩. 氧化沟液-固两相CFD模拟及ASM模型耦合研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013.
Xie H. Study on hydrodynamics simulation by liquid-solid two-phase CFD model and activated sludge model ASM1 in a Full-Scale Oxidation Ditch[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University Of Science And Technology, 2013.
[15] Ishii M. Two-fluid model for two-phase flow[J]. Multiphase Science and Technology, 1990, 5(1-4): 1-64.
[16] Gillot S, Heduit A. Effect of air flow rate on oxygen transfer in an oxidation ditch equipped with fine bubble diffusers and slow speed mixers[J]. Water Res., 2000, 34(5): 1756-1762.
[17] 李光, 杨晓钢, 戴干策. 鼓泡塔反应器气液两相流CFD数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(8): 1958-1965.
Li G, Yang X G, Dai G C. CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble column[J]. CIESC Journal, 2008, 59(8): 1958-1965.
[18] Higbie R. The rate of absorption of a pure gas into a still liquid during short periods of exposure[J]. Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng., 1935, 31: 365-389.
[19] ASCE. Asce Standard measurement of oxygen transfer in clean water[M]. Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007.
[20] Schiler L, Naumann Z. A drag coefficient correlation[J]. VDI Zeitung, 1935, 77: 318-320.

微曝氧化沟气液两相传质模型构建及传质影响因素分析

Model construction and influence factor analysis of gas-liquid mass transfer in a fine-bubble oxidation ditch

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	徐胜楠刘宏斐李雪良堵国成陈坚. 鼓泡塔细胞反应器流体力学与传质特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1192-1202.
[2]	高华鑫刘雪东张炜查晓峰吕圣男刘佳君吕开新. 新型热解炉燃烧室流热固耦合仿真与结构优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1203-1212.
[3]	田玉龙杨秀山孔行健许德华张志业. 磷石膏颗粒湍动流化特性实验及模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1224-1231.
[4]	熊桂龙苏文康王安奇王一泽. 颗粒形状对包衣设备内药片颗粒运动特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1232-1243.
[5]	张建伟牛聚超董鑫冯颖. 撞击流反应器流场数值模拟及其混合性能优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1244-1252.
[6]	王瑶曾子康李秋雯刘敏庞雨竹张成富梁玉军韩永生. 油水分离膜表面结构可控合成及性能研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(9): 1297-1304.
[7]	张静王胜昌田志国吴剑华龚斌. 周向多入口凹壁面切向射流流动特性分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1030-1039.
[8]	靳波张亚新. 颗粒尺度下混合催化剂床层中CO₂加氢反应体系数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1040-1052.
[9]	段怡如李宝宽黄雪驰刘中秋柴玉莹. 电渣重熔H13模具钢过程碳偏析的模拟研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(8): 1074-1084.
[10]	王翠华李光瑜苏方正龚斌吴剑华. 螺旋套管换热器壳程流体湍流换热热力性能数值研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(7): 935-943.
[11]	张炜刘文津张玉明李家州岳君容. 高温加压微型流化床内脉冲气射流扰动的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(7): 944-953.
[12]	李倩吉华冯东林张子扬段宗幸. 孔分布对多孔孔板流场和噪声的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(5): 601-611.
[13]	李雅侠许鹏宇韩泽民李运杭崔峰源张静. 矩形截面高宽比对射流强化螺旋通道传热性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(5): 612-621.
[14]	胡涛向星葛蔚王利民. 基于多GPU并行格子Boltzmann方法的方管湍流模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(3): 318-328.
[15]	周里群王智明汪振南李玉平黄治中. 三级活塞推料离心机数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2022, 22(3): 329-337.